Legal Opinion
Hume v. Watson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 14, 2010No. Civil Action 07-1742 (RWR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Terry Hume sued defendants Shawn Watson and Kraftwerks, Inc. in part for taking advance payment from her on home improvement work they were unlicensed to perform, in violation of the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“DCCPPA”) (D.C.Code § 28-3904(dd)), and the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations. Hume moves for partial summary judgment on Count II of the complaint against Watson in light of his guilty plea stemming from his conduct with Hume. Because there is no issue of fact remaining…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burke, Kenneth M. v. Gould, William B.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Moore v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Greer v. PaulsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bushrod v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Khalil v. El RafaeiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022
- Leake v. Alex General Construction, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Shalom v. Smith and SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023