Legal Opinion

Black v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided February 21, 2025No. 6:23-cv-01218Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS FAYE BLACK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 23-1218-EFM-ADM UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Counts I–IV of Plaintiffs Faye Black and Jeannine Tolson’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 69). Union Pacific asserts that Counts I–III, negligent remediation, continuing nuisance, and continuing trespass, are barred by the statute of repose and that Plaintiffs’ new fraudulent concealment claim, Count IV, is not sufficiently…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Ridge at Red Hawk, L.L.C. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. Harding v. K.C. Wall Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API