Legal Opinion

Shanghai Eswell Enter. Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 13, 2007No. Court 05-00439Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

EATON, Judge:

This matter is before the court on the Rule 56.2 motion for judgment upon the agency record of plaintiffsShanghai Eswell Enterprise Co., Ltd. (“Shanghai Eswell”); Jinfu Trading Co., Ltd. (“Jinfu PRC”); and Zhejiang Native Produce and Animal ByProducts Import & Export Group Corp. (“Zhejiang”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”). See Pis.’ Br. Supp. R. 56.2 Mot. J. Agency R. (“Pis.’ Mem.”). Defendant the United States and defendant-intervenors the American Honey Producers Association and the Sioux Honey Association oppose the motion. See Def.’s Mem. Opp’n Pis.’ Mot. J.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Nippon Steel Corporation, Nkk Corporation, Kawasaki Steel Corporation, and Toyo Kohan Co., Ltd. v. United States, and Mittal Steel USA Isg Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API