Legal Opinion

Scott v. Raub

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 28, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from decree of circuit court of Albemarle county, rendered October 19tli, 1889, in a chancery cause, wherein Sarah E. Raub, a woman of color, was complainant, and Robert Scott was defendant. The decree being in favor of complainant, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLacy, J.

*722The ease is as follows : Sarah E. Ranh, the appellee, a woman of color, filed her hill in the said court against the appellant, Robert Scott, for partition of the real estate which had been held jointly by the defendant and his deceased brother, James Scott, who were the sons of Jesse Scott, deceased. The complainant claimed to be, as the only child of James Scott, deceased, entitled to the undivided one-half of the said land which had belonged to him. But the defendant denied that she was the legitimate child of said James Scott, and entitled to the said land as such, and claimed it all for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  3. Malinda v. GardnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. Stikes v. SwansonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Adams v. SneedSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  3. Irving v. FordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Merrick v. BettsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Wood v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API