Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1870PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal'from St. Louis Circuit Court. Marriage being a civil contract, to which the consent of the parties capable in law of contracting is essential, the second pretended marriage of appellant was void.

Read the full summary

Appeal'from St. Louis Circuit Court. Marriage being a civil contract, to which the consent of the parties capable in law of contracting is essential, the second pretended marriage of appellant was void. (Anderson v. Poin-dexter, 6 Ohio St. 622 ; Smith v. The State, 9 Ala. 990-6; "Howard V. Howard, 6 Jones; 2,35 ; Malinda v. Gardner, 24 Ala. 719 ; State v. Samuel, 2 Dev. & Bat. 177.) Marriages of slaves are to be deemed null and void.' (Bishop oh Mai1, and Div., ed. 1864, §§ 156-8; Stanley "v. Nelson, 28 Ala. 514; B. C. 1845, ch. 167, p. 1014, § 7; Elliott v. Gurr,'2 Phillimore, 16; Browning…

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

The respondent instituted a suit for divorce against the appellant, in the St. Louis Circuit Court, on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, and, upon a bearing, a divorce and alimony were decreed. The parties are both negroes, and the appellant was formerly a slave ; and the question presented by the record is new in this court, and may be of interest to persons similarly situated.

It seems that Demás, the appellant, was a slave in Virginia, belonging to a Mr. Mason ; that whilst be lived there he'marlied 'a negress,- also a slave, by whom be bad three children. ■ His wife and children…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maguire v. MaguireCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
  2. Wightman v. WightmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  3. Malinda v. GardnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  4. Broh v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1821

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Renfrow v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  2. Washington v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Daniel v. SamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1880
  4. Estate of Guthery v. WetzelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Keen v. KeenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API