Legal Opinion
Kariuki v. Comair, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided June 2, 2011No. Civil Action No. 08-234-DLB-JGWPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge.
This employment discrimination action arises from Plaintiff Samuel Kariuki’s claim that Defendant Comair, Inc. discriminated against him on the basis of race and national origin when it failed to promote him to three available positions. Plaintiff brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Kentucky Anti-Discrimination Statute, KRS § 344.040.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Comair Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. #23). The motion has been fully briefed and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.