Legal Opinion

MacLaughlin v. Union Switch & Signal Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1947No. Civil Actions Nos. 6116, 6117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

The defendant in each of the above mentioned actions has moved to dismiss the action, asserting that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

As the claims present substantially parallel causes of action, the two cases are considered together.

The complainants in each case were World War II veterans who returned to their employment with the defendants within the statutory period of ninety days after discharge from the service of the United States.

William MacLaughlin had more than five years service with Union Switch & Signal Company when he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fishgold v. Sullivan Drydock & Repair Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Huffman v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1947
  2. Woods v. Glen Alden Coal Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Monticue v. Baltimore & O. R.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API