Legal Opinion

People v. Campbell

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1995No. D023101PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

In this appeal by the People of an alleged unauthorized sentence (Pen. Code, 1 § 1238, subd. (a)(10)), we conclude the trial court properly exercised its discretion under section 12022.5, subdivision (d) to stay execution of the additional term for Lamont Anthony Campbell’s admitted personal use of a firearm enhancement (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)) and affirm.

Factual Summary

In the early morning of June 2, 1994, Campbell was arrested after attempting, in two separate incidents, to take vehicles from two different women, one at gunpoint. He was charged with two counts of “attempted…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. FierroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. BrookfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API