Legal Opinion
Brabant v. City of South Gate
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 19, 1977No. Civ. 48282PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOOD, P. J.
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. A summary judgment declared that an ordinance of defendant city and a section of the municipal code of the city, which require payment of a license tax by a real estate broker and a real estate broker-salesman, were void as against plaintiff Davis Brabant (a real estate broker) and plaintiff Robert L. Brabant (a real estate broker-salesman).
Plaintiffs filed a joint declaration in support of their motion for summary judgment. Some of the facts appear in admissions in the pleadings. (There was no declaration on behalf of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Belridge Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Security Truck Line v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- City of Los Angeles v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Collison v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Los Angeles v. Belridge Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Park 'N Fly of San Francisco, Inc. v. City of South San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- MacY's Department Stores, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of San Jose v. Ruthroff & Englekirk Consulting Structural Engineers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982