Legal Opinion
Rome v. Romero
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 22, 2004No. 03-MK-1902(BNB)PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION TO STAY
KRIEGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Determination of Qualified Immunity (# 44), the Plaintiffs response (# 52), the Defendants’ reply (# 53), and the Plaintiffs sur-reply (# 54);1 and the Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Designate Defendants’ Expert Witnesses and to Extend Deadlines for All Discovery (# 61).2
BACKGROUND
The Plaintiffs pro se Complaint (#3) alleges four causes of action: (i) a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Romero,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Archuleta v. Board of Education for Espanola Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
- Billings v. City of Colorado SpringsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
- Brockman v. BimesteferDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Campbell v. RainesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
- Charles Brower, Jr. v. Brandon Leblanc and Gregory Champagne, in his Official Capacity as Sheriff of St. Charles Parish, et al.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.