Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Joseph v. Redwing

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1988No. 15879Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

With, as Abraham Lincoln taught us, malice towards none and charity for all; with an abiding belief that our tribal courts throughout this nation, as well as South Dakota, must play an indispensable role in governing the affairs of our Red Brothers, I most respectfully dissent, believing that the adjudication of this civil dispute must be litigated in the tribal courts.

South Dakota encompasses nine Indian Reservations. Each has an active tribal court. Of these reservations, seven have tribal courts which originate in a tribal sovereignty predating the United States Constitution. They are:…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. National Farmers Union Insurance v. Crow Tribe of IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API