Hernlund v. Town & Country Motors, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The action was brought to recover for injuries sustained through the negligent operation of defendant’s automobile. After the service of the summons, negotiations for a settlement were had between the attorneys of the parties, which resulted in defendants *126paying to plaintiff’s attorney $750 upon receiving, on February 8, 1922, a written instrument settling tbe cause of action and releasing defendants from any and all claims by reason of said automobile accident. This instrument purported to be signed by plaintiff, was witnessed by her attorney and one Anna Zagel, and duly acknowledged. At tbe…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Marple v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Althoff v. TorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Gibson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Kaiser & Brother v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Rodgers v. United States & Dominion Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chaney v. LiebermanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986