Kevin B. Williams v. Transworld Systems Inc., et al.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEVIN B WILLIAMS, Case No. 25-cv-09527-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO 9 v. DISMISS 10 TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 15, 31 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court are two motions to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint. The Court 14 finds these appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the motions are deemed 15 submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN 16 PART and DENIES IN PART the motions. 17 I. BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cyrus Ghazali v. John Moran, Sheriff Clark County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.