Legal Opinion

Quaker Furniture House, Inc. v. Ball

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1976No. 7625SC347PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Plaintiff assigns as error the order of the trial court setting aside the default judgment. Plaintiff concedes that service of the answer was had upon it within the thirty-day perjod after service of the summons and complaint prescribed by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 12(a) (1), but argues that the portion of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 5(d) which provides, “All pleadings subsequent to the complaint shall be filed with the court,” entitles it to a default judgment since the answer was not filed with the court until some thirty-five days after service of the summons and complaint. We do not agree.

Under…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peebles v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Tarr v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTYArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Hyder v. DerganceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Anderson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Anderson v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API