Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. United Corporation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 4, 1940No. Civ. A. 34, 35PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, District Judge.

These two cases were tried together, and the facts in each are sufficiently identical to permit disposing of them as one.

The actions were brought under the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U. S.C.A. § 400, seeking an adjudication of rights and liabilities under an automobile insurance policy issued to the defendants, "United Corporation of Massachusetts, hereinafter referred to as the United Company, and the Mexican Petroleum Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Mexican Company.

Findings of Fact.

The parties have submitted an agreed stipulation of facts which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Butte Brewing Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Wheeler v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Caron v. American Motorists Insurance Co. of ChicagoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Mullen v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Maryland Casualty Co. v. TigheDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1939

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Utilities Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  2. Bituminous Cas. Corp. v. Travelers Ins. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  3. Pacific Automobile Ins. v. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. of New YorkUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  4. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Spurlock v. Boyce-Harvey MacHineryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API