Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Toensing

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1938No. 31,240PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

This was a suit brought under the uniform declaratory judgments act to have a judicial construction placed upon a partnership agreement entered into between the parties; also, as corollary thereto, to have determined the respective rights of the parties to certain partnership funds segregated and set apart pending final outcome of the litigation. Upon issues duly framed and after a most thorough trial, the court made findings sustaining plaintiff’s contentions. Defendant’s motion for amended findings or a new trial was denied. Judgment was entered, and defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sun P. P. Assn. v. . Remington P. P. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Goldstein v. . Standard Accident Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Remington Paper & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Wiseth v. Goodridge Farmers Elevator & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Pillsbury Co., Inc. v. Wells Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  3. Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-SilverwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Matthews v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Froysland v. Leef Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API