Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Mathews

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 7, 1977No. CIV-2-76-78PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NEESE, District Judge.

This is an action for the judicial review of the final decision of the defendant administrator, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), denying the plaintiff’s claim for disability health insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423. The plaintiff moved for a summary judgment. Rule 56(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By order herein of November 4, 1976, the defendant was allowed 20 days in which to respond to such motion by the plaintiff, such failure to be deemed a waiver of any opposition thereto.. No such response was made by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Clistie Bell Thomas v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Glendal B. Webb v. Elliot L. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brissette v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985
  2. Spicer v. CalifanoDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1978
  3. Ramos Colon v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API