Mumford v. State

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

Anthony Tyrone Mumford appeals the revocation of his probation, presenting the following restated issues for review:

I. Was the evidence sufficient to prove that Mumford violated the conditions of probation?

II Did the trial court err in failing to enter written findings containing the reasons for revoking probation?

We affirm.

The facts favorable to the judgment are that on March 4, 1988, Mumford was convicted of burglary and theft and received coneur-rent sentences of six years and two years, respectively. The court suspended four years and ordered that Mumford be…