Legal Opinion

Ames v. Robert Moir & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 3, 1888PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Oook County; the lion. Kirk Hawes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGarnett, J.

This is an action of assumpsit for goods sold and delivered, commenced January 13, 1886, by appellees against appellant, on the following instrument:

“Contract Chicago, June 9, 1870.
“ I have ‘this day bought of Robert Moir & Co. one hundred (100) barrels highwines, ‘ iron bound,’ at one dollar and seven cents (81.07) per proof gallon. The conditions of sale are as follows: The buyer can call from 1st July to 20th of same month by giving three days notice, and if not called for by the 20th July, the seller has the privilege of delivering up to the end of July by giving three days notice. To be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ashley v. VischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Prenatt v. RunyonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Hooker v. HydeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. J. Jassoy & Co. v. HornIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Abrams v. PomeroyIllinois Supreme Court · 1851

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fowlkes v. LeaMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. Jackson Oil & Refining Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hart v. OtisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
  4. Grimley v. DavidsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API