Legal Opinion
Andrews v. Professional Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 9, 2010No. 3:09-cv-1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
NEALON, District Judge.
On October 8, 2009, Plaintiff, Mark Andrews, filed a complaint claiming violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (“FDCPA”). (Doc. 1). The Complaint alleged that an employee of Defendant, a corporation engaged in the business of collecting debts, placed a call to Plaintiff and left a message in an attempt to collect on an account. (Id.). Plaintiff alleged that the caller failed to disclose that the call was from a debt collector, failed to state the purpose of the call, failed to state the name of the debt…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- William T. Turner v. Schering-Plough CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zortman v. J.C. Christensen & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
- Hernandez v. Asset Acceptance, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Lobianco v. HayterDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2013