Automobile Bankers' Corp. v. Woodyard
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice
(after stating; .th,e( case as ‘ ’’ above).
The points on appeal are: (1).-Tiñere..was no oral, proof offered on the hearing, o$ the plea of privilege; (2) the allegations alone of the plaintiff’s petition cannot be considered as constituting prima facie evidence and prevail as against defendant’s verified plea of privilege; (3) the controverting affidavit did not • meet the requirement of averment, of adopting the allegations of the plaintiff’s original petition or by reference or as an exhibit.
It is first required of the trial judge upon the hearing of a plea of privilege to refer to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- World Company v. DowTexas Supreme Court · 1926
- Koch v. RoedenbeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Dees v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Shelton v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fordyce Gravel Co. v. SpringsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Balderama v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Motor Securities Corp. v. FulbrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935