Legal Opinion
Calixto Rodriguez-Gonzalez v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 11, 1967No. 20676_1PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALBERT, District Judge:
Calixto Rodriguez-Gonzalez appeals from his conviction following a trial by jury on an indictment alleging illegal concealment and transportation of marijuana in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 176a. Appellant asserts four errors upon which he seeks reversal of his conviction: (1) the search of the automobile which appellant was driving was illegal and the evidence thus obtained was therefore improperly used at his trial; (2) appellant was deprived of his right to confront the informer whose information led to the discovery of the marijuana; (3) the trial court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Melvin Corngold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Ben Edward Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Paul Garcia Murgia, Pedro Hernandez Ramirez and Joe Ramirez Carpio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. Serafin Alfonso, Humberto Rayo, Fabian Mora, Primo Antonio Serrano-TellezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Yves Glaziou and Rene L. A. LemieuxCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Charles LochanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- United States v. John Lee BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. James T. SkeensCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.