Legal Opinion

Staten v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 15, 1911No. 1388PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HARPER, Judge.

Appellant was prosecuted by information and complaint charged with pursuing the occupation of peddling buggies, the said occupation being one taxed by law. Hpon a trial, he was convicted, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $475, being the amount of the State and county tax.

The assistant attorney-general has filed a motion asking that the statement of facts be stricken from the record, because not signed by nor approved by the county judge. From an inspection of the record it appears that while the statement of facts was agreed to by defendant’s counsel and the county…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Basquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Branch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Landa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Landa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API