Revenue Cabinet, Commonwealth v. Amax Coal Co.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Chief Justice.
The issue to be determined on this appeal is whether the statutory sales and use tax exemption for machinery “used directly” in the manufacturing process is applicable to certain items owned by the respondents; Amax Coal Company and Gibraltar Coal Corporation, H and A Coal Company, and Harbert Construction Corporation and Star Fire Coals, Inc.
KRS 139.480(8) provides an exemption from sales and use taxes on “[m]achinery for new and expanded industry.” We are concerned here with the interpretation of the statutory definition of such machinery. KRS 139.170 states:
“Machiner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. WanamakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Schenley Distillers, Inc. v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. LuckettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
- Department of Revenue Ex Rel. Luckett v. Allied Drum Service, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1978
- Ross v. GREENE & WEBB LBR. CO., INC.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1978
- Department of Revenue v. State Contracting & Stone Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Revenue Cabinet v. Kentucky-American Water Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Revenue Cabinet v. Armco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
- Akers v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Revenue Cabinet Commonwealth v. Carpenter Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988