Legal Opinion

Williams v. . Hood, Commissioner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 8, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to have plaintiff's claim against the Bank of Pee Dee, now in the hands of the defendant, Gurney P. Hood, Commissioner of Banks, for liquidation because of its insolvency, adjudged a preference in the administration of the assets of said bank, on the ground that the funds deposited by the plaintiff with said bank, and in its possession at the date of its insolvency, were trust funds, and for that reason did not pass into the possession of the defendant as general assets of the insolvent bank.

The action was heard on a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that the facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blakey v. BrinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Parker v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lipe v. Guilford National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Bank of Thomasville v. LesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Sides v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Koepp v. Security-Home Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API