Legal Opinion
In re Abrams
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1994Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David B. Saxe, J.
The respondents in a preaction investigative proceeding initiated by the Attorney-General under General Business Law §§ 354 and 355 move by order to show cause to quash a subpoena served upon their former accountant, Alfred Scherzer (Scherzer), by the Attorney-General pursuant to General Business Law § 352.
In November 1993, the Attorney-General applied to this court for an order pursuant to General Business Law § 354 directing the respondents to appear for examination in connection with an investigation by the Attorney-General into the offer and sale of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Dental Cooperative, Inc. v. Attorney-GeneralAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- First Energy Leasing Corp. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Grandview Dairy, Inc. v. LefkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- State v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. Mobil Oil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.