Legal Opinion
Pilcher v. Direct Equity Lending
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 27, 2002No. 99-1245-JTM, 99-2446-JTM, 99-2447-JTMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
Currently before the court in this action by various consumers claiming that second mortgages violated provisions of the Kansas Uniform Consumer Credit Code (U3C) are motions for summary judgment by the plaintiff consumers seeking a determination of liability by defendants. In addition, one group of defendants has moved to dismiss the charges against them and/or in the alternative for summary judgment.
Summary judgment is proper where the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lozano v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Skinner v. Preferred CreditSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
- A. David Ostrem, Sr. v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, LpSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Mull v. Alliance Mortgage Banking Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2002
- Faircloth v. National Home Loan Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.