Legal Opinion

David Hooker v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2019No. Court of Appeals Case 18A-PC-2318PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Case Summary

[1] In October of 2001, the State entered into a plea agreement with David Hooker, pursuant to which he would plead guilty to Class C felony burglary. At the change-of-plea hearing, while Hooker denied having to push the already-open door to gain entry to the residence in question, he did admit that he had squeezed through the opening. The trial court accepted Hooker's guilty plea. In 2017, Hooker filed an amended petition for post-conviction relief ("PCR") in which he claimed that the trial court erred in accepting his guilty plea because he had denied his guilt at the hearing.…

Also in this document: Dissent · Bailey; Dissent · Bailey.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ross v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Harshman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Willis v. WesterfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Trondo L. Humphrey v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Pannarale v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ronald L. Emery v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API