Legal Opinion

People v. Meyer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 14, 1982No. 81-766, 81-767 consPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Van Deusen

In these consolidated cases, each respondent appeals from an order finding her or him in need of involuntary commitment. The respondents also contend that the trial court erred in entering an order which required the Illinois Guardianship and Advocacy Commission to pay for the respondents’ transcripts.

Both respondents, Donald Wall and Sherrie Meyer, have been long-term residents of the Dixon Developmental Center. Mr. Wall has been a voluntary patient of the center for more that 40 years. Ms. Meyer has been a voluntary patient for more than 15 years.

Mr. Wall is mildly retarded and suffers from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Electric Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Stryker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. People Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health v. St. Clair ClementAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. People v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. HaysIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. HaysAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. In Re James E.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. James E. v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. In re James E.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API