Legal Opinion
John Deere Co. v. Alamosa National Bank
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 1989No. 88CA1834PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TURSI.
In this appeal from a summary judgment, defendant, Alamosa National Bank, (Bank) contends that the senior perfected security interest of plaintiff, John Deere Company, lapsed as a matter of law because it failed to file a legally valid continuation statement within the prescribed time period. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
The trial court’s conclusions of law and order were based on undisputed facts. On or about October 15, 1981, Thomas W. and Rita M. Curtis executed a retail installment contract-security agreement, which was secured by a tractor, in favor of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Tippett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Bond Enterprises, Inc. v. Western Bank of Farmington (In Re Bond Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1985
- In Re PaulUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
- United States, Small Business Administration v. Freeland (In Re Chaseley's Foods, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Alpine Associates, Inc. v. KP & R, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990