Maxwell v. Michigan Fidelity Acceptance Corp. (In Re Maestas)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
JAMES E. SHAPIRO, Bankruptcy Judge.
The doctrine of res judicata — often referred to in modern terminology as “claim preclusion” — has influenced the outcome of countless bankruptcy decisions in the past and, undoubtedly, will continue to do so in the future. When res judicata applies, it forecloses relitigation of claims which were either decided or could have been decided in prior litigation. The case at bar is yet another in the line of many cases which have struggled with this issue.
In this adversary, the defendant, Michigan Fidelity Acceptance Corp. (“Michigan Fidelity”), has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In the Matter of ENERGY COOPERATIVE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Bankrupt-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Crafts Plus+, Inc. v. Foothill Capital Corp. (In Re Crafts Plus+, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1998
- Enron Corp. v. International Finance Corp. (In Re Enron Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Cavanaugh v. Zimmerman (Linc Capital, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.