Legal Opinion
Reusch v. Fountain
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 25, 1994No. Civ. A. MJG-91-3124PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARBIS, District Judge.
This case was tried before the Court without a jury. The Court, having heard the evidence, reviewed the exhibits and considered the legal memoranda submitted by the parties, issues this Memorandum Decision as its findings of fact and conclusions of law in compliance with Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
In this case, a group of disabled children residing in Montgomery County, Maryland, claim that Montgomery County Public Schools (“MCPS”) has systematically failed to meet its obligation to provide them with an opportunity to obtain extended school year…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Scanlon v. BattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- T.M. ex rel. A.M. v. Cornwall Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Cavanagh v. GrasmickDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- J.N. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Zearley v. AckermanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Wagner v. BOARD OF EDUC., MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.