County of Santa Clara v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Concurrence
*334McADAMS, J., Concurring.
As the majority observes, plaintiffs contend on appeal that the trial court erred: (1) in sustaining demurrers to their public nuisance claims; (2) in denying them leave to amend to allege trespass; and (3) in granting summary judgment on their remaining causes of action for strict products liability, negligence, fraud, and unfair competition. Addressing those contentions, the majority (1) agrees in part with the first contention, concluding that the representative plaintiffs, seeking abatement only, stated a cause of action for public nuisance; (2) disagrees with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.