Wright v. Eastlick
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Siskiyou County. J. S. Beard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This action involves a contest regarding a line dividing mining claims in Siskiyou county. The trial was by jury, and the verdict and judgment for the defendants. The appeal is from the judgment and from an order refusing the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. Among the grounds of the motion for a new trial is the alleged misconduct of the jury. And this is pressed on the appeal. The misconduct complained of relates principally to the jurors John Keville and John B. Lowden, the former of whom was elected and acted as foreman. The affidavits produced in support of the motion for a new trial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- People v. StokesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. AzoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Coughanour v. Hoffman's EstateIdaho Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. Wong LoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Putro v. BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1966
- Finlen v. HeinzeMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. McMahonMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Dimmick v. AlvarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.