Howard v. City of Chattanooga
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
The trial judge sustained a demurrer to a declaration in this suit for personal injuries. The declaration alleged that Howard was a prisoner, convicted of a misdemeanor, who was injured while working out a fine at a rock quarry as the result of the negligence of his boss or guard employed by the municipality. The demurrer denied liability of the City for the alleged negligence because the City was in the performance of a governmental function.
The general rule unquestionably is that a municipality is not liable for injuries resulting- from the negligence of its employees in charge of prisoners…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Curran v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Haley v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Hughes v. . County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Gray v. Mayor of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Ulrich v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coffman v. City of PulaskiTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
- Coffman v. City of PulaskiTennessee Supreme Court · 1967