Legal Opinion

Coffman v. City of Pulaski

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1967Published

1Opinion of the Court

422 S.W.2d 429 (1967)

John Edward COFFMAN, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

CITY OF PULASKI, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

September 18, 1967.

Rehearing Denied January 8, 1968.

Joe W. Henry, Jr., Pulaski, of counsel, Henry, Henry & Lewis, Pulaski, for plaintiff in error.

David E. Cheatham, Pulaski, for defendant in error.

OPINION

HUMPHREYS, Justice.

This case is here on appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff-in-error's declaration, and dismissing his suit.

Plaintiff-in-error sued the City of Pulaski for personal injuries sustained when he was shot by a city policeman trying to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API