Stewart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
Upon a trial for murder appellant was convicted of manslaughter and her penalty fixed at the lowest prescribed by law.
Appellant has hut one bill of exception. It is to this language used by the district attorney in his closing argument to the jury: “The defendant seems to have a local reputation of being a cutter.” The circumstances under which this was said the bill in no way discloses, nor does it disclose anything else in the case so as to require this court to pass upon the bill, but in any event it presents no error. Ho written charge was requested requiring the jury…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Woodward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
3Cited by1 opinion
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926