Legal Opinion
Smith v. Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 21, 1977No. C-2-75-830PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNCAN, District Judge.
This Civil action, brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., is before the Court for a decision on the merits following trial. The Court sets forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law in this opinion, in accordance with Rule -52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiff Barbara Smith Hensley, a black woman, was employed by defendant Columbus Metropolitan Housing Authority in May 1957, and with the exception of a nine-month absence, has worked for the Authority continuously until the present.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dr. Joy HOCHSTADT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WORCESTER FOUNDATION FOR EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Rush Pettway and Peter J. Wrenn v. American Cast Iron Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jeanne Harrington v. Vandalia-Butler Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Glass v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- City of Garfield Heights v. SimpsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Merkel v. Scovill, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Harris v. Fulton-Dekalb Hospital AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.