Legal Opinion
United States v. Conner
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 4, 1985No. Nos. 84-3008, 84-3018PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, District Judge:
' These consolidated cases involve a multicount indictment charging six defendants with racketeering in violation of Title 18, § 1962(c) and conspiracy to engage in racketeering in violation of Title 18, § 1962(d) and wire fraud in violation of Title 18, '§§ 1341, 1343 and Title 18, §§ 2 and 2314.
Count One charged defendants, Taylor, Darby and Conner with engaging in a pattern of racketeering activity involving two separate real estate transactions referred to as “Farmland-Duval Transaction” and “Farmland-IMC Transaction.” This Count *569charged the three…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. RybickiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. CaporaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.