Legal Opinion

Boucher v. Exide Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1986No. 91A02-8602-CV-56PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Donald and Marilyn Boucher (Bouchers) appeal the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Exide Corporation (Exide), the defendant below.

We affirm.

The facts most favorable to Bouchers are as follows: Donald Boucher was employed as a foreman by Exide. On or about May 21, 1982, Boucher was in the foreman's office completing some paperwork. Another foreman, Kerns, entered the office, verbally assaulted Boucher, then hit Boucher twice. The second blow knocked Boucher from his chair and onto the floor, whereupon Boucher "came up swinging." Appellant's Brief at 5. On May 28, 1982,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maule Coal Co. v. PartenheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Mead Johnson and Co. v. OppenheimerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Cole v. PulleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hammes v. BrumleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Robson v. Texas Eastern Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n v. SchaferIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Valley Federal Savings Bank v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Schlosser v. Bank of Western IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API