Legal Opinion
United States v. Jim Dean Warren
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1979No. 78-5460PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Jim Dean Warren was convicted of knowingly or intentionally possessing a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1970). He raises a panoply of arguments on this appeal: (1) that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress; (2) that the jury panel should have been discharged because of prejudicial remarks of a prospective juror; (3) that a mistrial should have been granted because of prejudicial remarks by the prosecutor; (4) that the jury deliberations were tainted by the jury’s ex parte…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. Cecil RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Martin Gonzalez MunozCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Jose Hector Santos VergaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. James Norton, United States of America v. Paul Fosco, James Pinckard, Paul A. Di Franco, James Norton, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. John David GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Benjamin Barry Kramer, Randy Thomas Lanier, Eugene Albert Fischer, and Kay Dee Bell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.