Legal Opinion

Hagins v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1994No. 91-CF-1299, 92-CF-51 and 92-CF-70PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARRELL, Associate Judge:

Before us are consolidated appeals arising from two separate trials in each of which both defendants were charged with multiple crimes of violence, including armed rape or assault with intent to rape. The primary issues on appeal involve appellants’ efforts at the second trial, in which their defense to the charged assaults was consent, either to question the two complaining witnesses about alleged prior acts of prostitution, or (in the case of appellant Hagins) to argue in summation that certain DNA evidence presented to the jury showed that the witnesses had engaged…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. JoyceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Byrd v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hanna v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Umanzor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Spain v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. CrimsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API