Legal Opinion

Knox v. Cuna Mutal Insurance Society

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 15, 1968No. 1 Div. 511PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Plaintiffs took a nonsuit after their amended complaint, consisting of Counts One and Two, as last amended, were stricken on motion of defendant-appellee.

The original count claimed damages for a breach of a policy of insurance entered into by and between the defendant, Cuna Mutual Insurance Society, a Corporation, and Scott Southern Division Employees Credit Union (hereinafter called the Credit Union), of which the then single plaintiff, J. B. Knox, was a member. The breach complained of was the failure of the defendant insurer to pay off the balance due on certain loans made…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH & A. ASS'N OF OMAHA v. BullardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Betts v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  4. &198tna Ins. Co. v. KoonceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Birmingham Gas Co. v. SanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. ALFA Mut. Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Albert v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. E & S FACILITIES, INC. v. Precision Chipper Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. Bank of the Southeast v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API