Legal Opinion · Dissent

John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 13, 1963No. 431-57Published

1DissentWhitaker, Judge

Having written the opinion of the court in Goldwasser v. United States, Ct.Cl., No. 477-61, 325 F.2d 722, this day decided, it follows that I disagree with the opinion in this case. It reiterates, I think, the positions taken in the dissenting opinions in the Goldwasser case.

In Goldwasser, the defendant became dissatisfied with plaintiff’s performance but it did not refuse further to honor iiie contract because plaintiff had defaulted in performance, but, instead, took refuge in the “indefinite-quantities clause of the contract, contending that under that clause it was no longer obligated to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. College Point Boat Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Klein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. Neil a Goldwasser, Doing Business as Century Offset Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. College Point Boat Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API