Legal Opinion

Fritsche v. Hudspeth

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1953No. 5644PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Justice.

Action by H. W. Fritsche and wife against T. J. Hudspeth, his wife Minnie B. Hudspeth, and Ash Fork Live Stock Company, a corporation, seeking damages and to enjoin the defendants from obstructing the flow of certain flood waters as they drained into and passed down Partridge Creek, a tributary of Chino Wash, upon which is located plaintiffs’ property and point of claimed diversion. Trial was had before the court sitting without a jury which made findings to the effect that the defendant Ash Fork Live Stock Company maintains for livestock watering purposes a livestock watering…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lindsey v. McClureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Phillip Zannaras, J. P. Robinson, Jr., and U.S. Tungsten Corporation v. Bagdad Copper Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  2. Fritsche v. HudspethArizona Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API