Legal Opinion

Dwinnell v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1902No. Nos. 12,978-(164)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs, as receivers of Minneapolis Fire & Marine Mutual Insurance Company, from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Elliott, J., sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

, BROWN, J.

Action by the receivers of a mutual insurance company, appointed under G. S. 1894, c. 76, to wind up the affairs of the corporation, .against the subscribers and contributors to what is described as a guaranty or subscription fund. The appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

It appears from the complaint that the Minneapolis Fire & Marine Mutual Insurance Company was incorporated in 1895, under and pursuant to Laws 1895, c. 175, for the purpose of engaging in a mutual fire insurance business. At the time of its incorporation the name of the company was the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pfister v. GerwigIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hope Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. . PerkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Kennan v. RundleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Hope Mutual Life Insurance v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  5. Smith v. ShermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Donovan v. DixonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Dwinnell v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Dwinnell v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. State Ex Rel. Minnesota Mutual Indemnity Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API