Cass County State's Attorney v. Vantreece
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Alexander Vantreece appeals from an order civilly committing him as a sexually dangerous individual. He argues the district court erred in finding he was a sexually dangerous individual under N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.3 because the State failed to present clear and convincing evidence he has, or will have, serious difficulty controlling his behavior. We hold the evidence is sufficient to support the district court’s finding that Vantreece is a sexually dangerous individual, and we affirm the order.
I
[¶ 2] In August 2007, shortly after this Court reversed Vantreece’s conviction…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- In re the Detention of ThorellWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Wisconsin v. LaxtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Cass County State's Attorney v. R.A.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re VantreeceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009