Legal Opinion

Estate Property Corp. v. Hudson Coal Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

Defendant moves for judgment on the pleadings. In the amended complaint three causes of action are alleged, although the first may be deemed to state two separate causes — one for loss of royalties by reason of defendant’s failure to operate a tract of coal land leased from plaintiff; the other for improper removal from the land of buildings and equipment. The second cause of action is for the conversion of coal in a certain culm bank. The third cause is for negligence due to the defendant’s mismanagement of mining operations, by which plaintiff suffered irretrievable injury in the loss of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Agate v. . LowenbeinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Matter of Hosiery Mfrs. Corp. v. . GoldstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate Property Corp. v. Hudson Coal Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Estate Property Corp. v. Hudson Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. Estate Property Corp. v. Hudson Coal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API