Legal Opinion
Avis Rent-A-Car System v. Vang
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 7, 2000No. 99-1043 (JRT/FLN)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Avis Rent-a-Car (“Avis”) and Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”), and defendants move on cross-motions for summary judgment for a judicial declaration on the following issues: 1) whether Minn.Stat. § 170.54 applies to hold Avis vicariously liable for the negligence of Cheng Lee and if so, whether Avis’ liability is limited to the statutory amount provided in Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 5(a)(2); 2) whether Cheng Lee qualifies as an “authorized…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Howard McAllisterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Boatwright v. BudakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Kender v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010