Legal Opinion

Camp v. Camp

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 14, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case for wilfully and maliciously piling logs on plaintiff’s land and interfering with her use and occupation thereof. Plea, the general issue with notice that defendant claimed title to the land and the easement by deed and by prescription. Trial by jury at the December Term, 1912, Orange County, Stanton, J., presiding. Yerdiet and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

This is an action of trespass on the case to recover damages for wilfully and maliciously piling logs upon *120tbe land of the plaintiff, and for annoying and incommoding the plaintiff in the nse and occupation of certain land. Plea, general issue with notice that defendant claimed title to these lands and the easements by deed and also by prescription.

To meet defendant’s evidence tending to show a prescriptive title, the' court ruled in substance that the plaintiff might show in rebuttal that Eli Camp, the plaintiff’s father and her immediate grantor, permitted his wife and his daughter, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lampert v. Judge & Dolph Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  2. Krug v. . PitassNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Earl v. TupperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1873
  4. Howard v. . SextonNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Moore v. DukeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harlow v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. D'Orazio Et Ux. v. PashbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  3. 243 Colchester Ave v. OconnorVermont Superior Court · 2025
  4. Kinneston v. RaicheVermont Superior Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API